While the FDA does appear to listen rather intently to comments on its bioequivalence (BE) draft guidances, and will occasionally reopen comment periods, it is still the exception rather than the rule. Today a Federal Register (FR) notice (here) announced another sixty-day comment period during which such comments will be entertained.
In a time that we find ourselves so busy, who has time to attend a conference? That was my initial thought, but when asked to speak at the conference, it became clear that this would be a unique opportunity to better understand the regulatory landscape while surrounded by members of India pharma and in the presence of key FDA regulators.
The DIA Complex Drug-Device Combination Workshop was held at Sheraton Silver Spring on October 9‑10, 2018. The second day’s discussion was dominated by issues related to transdermal systems and intrauterine devices. The presenters on the second day were mostly from the FDA, with a few from academia and CROs. The FDA presenters focused on quality expectations for devices,
The DIA Complex Drug-Device Combination Workshop is being held at the Sheraton Silver Spring during October 9‑10, 2018. The first day of the conference dealt with the regulatory aspects of the generic submissions for these kinds of products, and discussions on clinical aspects related to complex generics, with a focus on inhalation products.
The meeting was well-attended,
A quick survey of recent FDA Form 483s shows that firms are struggling to meet FDA expectations for timeliness of stability testing. During the last twelve months, the FDA has issued at least sixteen Form 483s for observations related to the timeliness of stability sample testing.
Neither the current guidance ICH Q1A(R2) “Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products” nor the FDA November 2003 Guidance for Industry “Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products” details the expectations for the timeliness of stability sample testing.
It is understandable that during an investigation the initial focus is determining the cause along with the associated impact assessment and the identification and implementation of a corrective action. However, what can get overlooked during the investigation process is the importance of trending. This is a key component of root cause confirmation, assessing the appropriateness and effectivity of corrective action and determining whether there are any underlying cause/s for noted repeat incidents.
The FDA has announced a proposed rule to repeal its regulation requiring any drug product that uses irradiation to be approved under an NDA or ANDA. The Notice states that “this action is part of FDA’s implementation of Executive Orders (EOs) 13771 and 13777. Under these EOs, FDA is comprehensively reviewing existing regulations to identify opportunities for repeal,
Reduced testing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API), excipients, and other raw materials can be a valid approach to gaining overall efficiencies in the pharmaceutical quality control laboratory. However, the choice of tests to perform and the justification for choosing those tests are key elements of operating a compliant Reduced Testing Program that is also scientifically sound.
The FDA’s Douglas Throckmorton, M.D., Deputy Director, Regulatory Programs, in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), gave a presentation on April 12, 2016 entitled, “FDA Regulation of Marijuana: Past Action, Future Plans.” A key take-away from the presentation was that the Agency supports the development of drugs derived from marijuana (MJ). This included mention of a guidance on the use of botanicals and the availability of Agency tools for expedited development (i.e.,
The GDUFA II reauthorization process involved a lot of agreements from the FDA. One of those agreements was for the Agency to publish a guidance on changes to drug substances that addressed the type of changes, their categories for submission (PAS, CBE, CBE-30, or annual report) and the necessary documentation that must be submitted to support the proposed changes.
The Pink Sheet recently posted an article authored by James Davison, Ph.D. Vice President of Lachman Consultants that addresses the criticality of Data Integrity outside of the laboratory.
The article highlights that regulators are making clear that issues of data integrity go well beyond what happens in drug laboratories or clinical trials and that the data compliance issues that have plagued the laboratories are relevant to areas such as manufacturing.
In yesterday’s Federal Register (FR) prepublication page, the FDA described three drugs that were nominated for inclusion on the bulk list but all three were declined for the same basic reason.
Inclusion on the bulk list would have provided 503B-registered compounding facilities with the ability to utilize the substances in bulk in order to prepare finished-drug compounded product directly from the active pharmaceutical ingredient.
Today, the FDA finalized a draft guidance that issued on June 16, 2016 titled Quality Attribute Considerations for Chewable Tablets (here). The document provides advice to sponsors of NDAs, ANDAs, some chemistry supplements, INDs, and manufacturers of non-application chewable products on the critical attributes that should be identified and quantified for chewable immediate release tablets.
Many articles had decried the fact that biosimilar uptake is not what FDA or the drug industry anticipated. Look, I have been around in this industry in one form or another (pharmacist, regulator, and consultant) for 46 years and have seen a lot in my day. They say history repeats itself – no I am not planning to go back to FDA – but the same concepts and forces are in play today as they were when Hatch-Waxman (H-W) was first passed.
After a disastrous start to the new year and the significant slowdown in approvals resulting from the OGD’s strict application of the provisions of the USP Elemental Impurity Chapter while awaiting harmonization with ICH Q3D, the approvals have begun flowing again. There are some changes in the final guidance (here) from the draft that the FDA made in the harmonization effort.