Is Your Instrumentation Qualified for Intended Use?

The USP is planning to revise their USP<1058> Analytical Instrument Qualification Chapter, August 01, 2017. The planned principal changes to USP<1058> are as follows:

  1. The revised USP chapter introduces the concept of a user-driven risk assessment to establish the level of integrated instrument qualification to demonstrate “fitness for purpose” of the instrument.

Firm Decides to Remove Opana ER from the Market – What Do I Know?

On Thursday as I was giving a talk to a firm about the abuse-deterrent drug landscape and potential for the future, the firm that makes and markets Opana ER was announcing that it was agreeing to remove its product from the marketplace in accord with the FDA recommendations.

During the presentation, I was   asked by one participant what I thought the maker of Opana ER would do. 

The Digital Life

In a recent blog post, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb reinforced FDA’s plans for supporting the growing innovation in medical technology.  Dr. Gottlieb reemphasized the support for digital medical technologies through the implementation of the 21st Century Cures Act, which requires FDA to clearly define those technologies that are used for the promotion of health life choices and generally exempt from,

Timing of Notice, the Patent Dance, and the Supreme Court Ruling

As reported by FiercePharma here, the Supreme Court sided with biosimilar makers regarding the timing of notice to the innovator and agreed that the notice can be accomplished prior to FDA approval of the biosimilar application.  Early notice could provide biosimilar applicants up to a 180-day earlier launch, meaning (obviously) a potentially earlier market entry (should everything go in their favor).

Data Integrity: A View from Down Under

Following the lead of many of the world’s pharmaceutical regulatory agencies, on April 6, 2017, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) released a Data Management and Data Integrity (DMDI) policy statement. TGA states that the policy “serves to provide some clarification regarding the TGA’s official position regarding DMDI practices for industry,” but at the same time noting that,

ICH M10 – Bioanalytical Method Validation – Is Harmony Coming to a Lab Near You Soon?

The 11th annual Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) has ended in sunny Hollywood, CA.  The WRIB provides an opportunity for both industry and regulators to discuss challenges facing the bioanalytical community in the analysis of both small and large molecules.  This year’s workshop had the largest turnout ever, with approximately 750 attendees from all over the world representing large brand pharmaceutical companies,

GXP Data Flow and Security – FDA’s Looking for Sure!

It’s late, do you know where your data is?  Are you really sure?  Would you be able to assure a regulatory agency that you fully understand and control the flow of data from data generation through processing, reporting, data review, archive and retrieval?  If the answer to all the above questions is yes, congratulations!  Unfortunately,

Hey, Wait a Minute Here! Are the UFAs in Danger?

Just as the various User Fee Acts (UFA) go to congress for mark-up and reauthorization, a proposed administration budget contains a suggested doubling of fees charged for medical product reviews.  Am I seeing this correctly?  Industry and FDA have worked tirelessly over the last year and a half to get the various User Fee programs negotiated for reauthorization and at the 11th hour,

Ozone-Depleting Final Rule Escapes Freeze

In a Federal Register Notice published today, FDA announced that the direct final rule on “Use of Ozone Depleting Substances” published on October 26, 2016 is “excluded from the memorandum of January 20, 2017, from the Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff, entitled ‘Regulatory Freeze Pending Review,’ this action confirms the effective date of February 23,

Who IS Going to Be the New Boss at FDA?

Well, not naming any names- I really won’t come out and say who my pick would be, but, depending on the administration’s pick, this is a pretty crucial decision for the Agency.  Here are some of the attributes I think would be important for the position:

  1. A knowledge of the FDA review and approval process
  2. A strong medical background
  3. A person that believes that science should rule the day
  4. Someone who is above the political fray
  5. A person that has both compassion and common sense
  6. Someone with an understanding of how the drug industry operated

Which of these attributes do I think is most important?