The Q&A document addresses a number of frequently asked questions about the Pre-Launch Activities Importation Request (PLAIR) process, and when you can or cannot use a PLAIR for importing unapproved drug product into the United States. Quite interestingly, there are quite a few answers of “no” to the FAQs, which likely demonstrates that firms have been trying to apply the PLAIR process to situations for which it was not intended.
Each year at holiday time, we try to provide a little levity in some of our blog posts, as well as spread some good cheer. So here you go – love it or not – we fully expect this to be sung outside Building 31 in Bethesda on the evening of December 24th.
To the tune of “Winter Wonderland,” this is “Winter Wonderland,
Excipients are components used and intentionally added to a drug product with no expectation that they will have a therapeutic effect. A novel excipient is one that has never been used and “reviewed in an FDA approved drug product or does not have an established use in foods”. Since the beginning of time, the Agency has struggled with evaluation of novel excipients in INDs,
Just look around, watch the television, read the newspaper, and what do you see? Seems like very few reasons to be thankful. School and workplace shootings, the political scene is as nasty as I ever remember in my 70 years on earth. Climate change is threatening the future of our children, and the environmental controls have been set back 50 years as the oceans continue to rise,
Dr. Scott Gottlieb is back in the private sector and took the time to give the attendees at the AAM conference a brief overview of his experience as Commissioner. Dr. Gottlieb spoke about the creation of the Competition Action Plan which addressed action on the following issues:
- Gaming the system through REMS and restricted distribution systems and patent issues
- Devising a path forward for faster approval of complex generic drug products
- Anticompetitive tactics
He also spoke about what,
The reinvention of the AAM’s Fall conference from The Fall Technical Conference to the GRx + Biosimilars Conference continues to be a success. This year’s meeting included a very stimulating and informative agenda pertinent to generic drugs and biosimilar products.
On Monday morning, Suzette Kox, MSc, Pharm. Sec’y. Int’l. Generic and Biosimilar Medicines Association (IGBA) spoke on The Importance of Global Regulatory Harmonization for Biosimilars.
The GRx-Biosims 2019 meeting started off with a meditation and stretching exercise; after that, we had to put our minds to work and begin exercising out neurons. Anna Abram, Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Legislation, and International Affairs, provided an update on generic drug activity, action plans, and biosimilars. Key points and highlights were:
- Record breaking number of ANDA approvals in FY 2019 (935)
- 125 first-time generic approvals
- 138 approvals for complex generics
- 205 product-specific guidances
- The use of the Mutual Recognition Agreement with the EU on inspections designed to keep regulatory authorities from duplicating inspectional efforts
- FDA has approved twenty-three biosimilars
Drug shortages have been in the headlines for years but getting them under control has proved to be a complex, multifaceted problem. Reports of critical shortages for chemotherapeutic agents, saline solutions, other injectables, and oral medications have lead healthcare providers oft times to seek other options for therapy. There has even been one firm created expressly to aid hospitals to avoid or resolve drug shortages.
FDA published a revised draft guidance titled Postmarketing Studies and Clinical Trials—Implementation of Section 505(o)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Guidance for Industry. If you have any post approval study requirements for any of your products, you should pay close attention to this document.
In describing the document, the Agency says:
“This guidance describes FDA’s statutory authority to require certain postmarketing studies and clinical trials under section 505(o)(3) of the FD&C Act (i.e.,
The FDA released a final Q&A document titled “Identification of Manufacturing Establishments in Applications Submitted to CBER and CDER: Questions and Answers” that provides answers to some of the most frequently asked and problematic questions raised by incomplete manufacturing, testing, packaging, etc.
The document provides specific guidance on what, where, and how to list such information in the 356h and in the relevant modules of the application.
A new draft guidance titled (quite originally) Drug Master Files (here) has replaced the Drug Master Files: Guidelines that was published in 1989. There have been many changes to the requirements and procedures for DMFs based on new laws, policies, and procedures, as well as procedures associated with GDUFA commitment letters for ANDAs,
It has been a while since the FDA updated its guidance on PDUFA fee waivers, etc., but the newly released Prescription Drug User Fee Act Waivers, Reductions, and Refunds for Drug and Biological Products document provides much needed new information about the FDA’s fee program. The Federal Register Notice (here) announcing the availability of the guidance states:
“This guidance describes the types of waivers,
The use of alternate methods, especially for USP methods, some of which are rather old, has long been a question that both the industry and the FDA have contemplated. Alternate methods can be easier to use and, in some instances, more accurate and reliable. But how can you demonstrate that an alternate method is indeed equivalent to an existing method?
In a short Warning Letter issued by the FDA on August 29, 2019, the Agency informed a China-based testing firm that, because it refused inspection, that FDA would withhold approvals of any ANDA or NDA in which it was cited as a testing laboratory. The FDA takes refusal of inspection very seriously and the impact on NDA or ANDA sponsors (or,
In three separate Federal Register Notices, the FDA announced the fee for the use of certain priority‑review vouchers (here, here, and here). Priority-review vouchers are awarded to a firm that that gains approval for a designated tropical disease, a material threat medical countermeasure, or a designated rare pediatric disease when an application is approved for a specific drug or biologic that meets the regulatory and statutory provisions of the relevant acts,